{
  "id": 191678,
  "title": "is classification or smart segmentation problem ?",
  "url": "/competitions/rsna-str-pulmonary-embolism-detection/discussion/191678",
  "author_name": "SeshuRaju 🧘‍♂️",
  "post_date": "2020-10-17T22:28:45.338000",
  "votes": 1,
  "comment_count": 0,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Most of targets are based on <strong>positions</strong> of the scans instead complete image. do we need to consider it as classification or goal of this competition is smart segmentation ? </p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/rsna-str-pulmonary-embolism-detection/discussion/183850\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/rsna-str-pulmonary-embolism-detection/discussion/183850</a></p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 1052555,
      "postDate": "2020-10-17T22:28:45.340Z",
      "content": "<p>Most of targets are based on <strong>positions</strong> of the scans instead complete image. do we need to consider it as classification or goal of this competition is smart segmentation ? </p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/rsna-str-pulmonary-embolism-detection/discussion/183850\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/rsna-str-pulmonary-embolism-detection/discussion/183850</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Most of targets are based on **positions** of the scans instead complete image. do we need to consider it as classification or goal of this competition is smart segmentation ? \n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/rsna-str-pulmonary-embolism-detection/discussion/183850",
      "votes": 1
    }
  ],
  "comments": [],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1052555": "Most of targets are based on **positions** of the scans instead complete image. do we need to consider it as classification or goal of this competition is smart segmentation ? \n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/rsna-str-pulmonary-embolism-detection/discussion/183850"
  }
}