{
  "id": 608575,
  "title": "Successful submissions without error handling? ",
  "url": "/competitions/rsna-intracranial-aneurysm-detection/discussion/608575",
  "author_name": "Ian Pan",
  "post_date": "2025-09-20T22:47:06.917000",
  "votes": 14,
  "comment_count": 6,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Curious if anyone has been able to successfully submit a notebook that does not skip failed studies with a try-except block.</p>\n<p>My loading function works on all the training series without issues but pretty quickly throws an exception when I submit. The notebook I am submitting just runs the loading function and submits a dummy prediction of all 0.5.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 3292060,
      "postDate": "2025-09-20T22:47:06.917Z",
      "content": "<p>Curious if anyone has been able to successfully submit a notebook that does not skip failed studies with a try-except block.</p>\n<p>My loading function works on all the training series without issues but pretty quickly throws an exception when I submit. The notebook I am submitting just runs the loading function and submits a dummy prediction of all 0.5.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Curious if anyone has been able to successfully submit a notebook that does not skip failed studies with a try-except block.\n\nMy loading function works on all the training series without issues but pretty quickly throws an exception when I submit. The notebook I am submitting just runs the loading function and submits a dummy prediction of all 0.5.",
      "votes": 12
    },
    {
      "id": 3293026,
      "postDate": "2025-09-22T23:19:58.203Z",
      "content": "<p>Hi <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/vaillant\" target=\"_blank\">@vaillant</a>, we've successfully submitted without try-except blocks. But DICOM attributes do have default values in getattr though 🤔</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi @vaillant, we've successfully submitted without try-except blocks. But DICOM attributes do have default values in getattr though 🤔",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 3294248,
          "postDate": "2025-09-25T16:56:19.817Z",
          "content": "<p>Hi! May I ask if you noticed which attribute may have a flaw in the hidden test set? For me I find the multiframe dcms are fishy, and 'PixelSpacing' and 'ImageOrientationPatient' could be the problem</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "Hi! May I ask if you noticed which attribute may have a flaw in the hidden test set? For me I find the multiframe dcms are fishy, and 'PixelSpacing' and 'ImageOrientationPatient' could be the problem",
          "votes": 1,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 3294349,
              "postDate": "2025-09-25T23:44:35.253Z",
              "content": "<p>Sorry <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/wenxiaozhan\" target=\"_blank\">@wenxiaozhan</a>, I don't know what could be wrong. But I'm not accessing PixelSpacing neither ImageOrientationPatient. InstanceNumber, Modality, RescaleSlope, and RescaleIntercept were accessed with no problem.</p>",
              "rawMarkdown": "Sorry @wenxiaozhan, I don't know what could be wrong. But I'm not accessing PixelSpacing neither ImageOrientationPatient. InstanceNumber, Modality, RescaleSlope, and RescaleIntercept were accessed with no problem.",
              "votes": 2
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 3292126,
      "postDate": "2025-09-21T05:12:15.067Z",
      "content": "<p>Nope , i think there is a problem in multiframe</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Nope , i think there is a problem in multiframe\n",
      "votes": 1
    },
    {
      "id": 3292146,
      "postDate": "2025-09-21T06:30:02.763Z",
      "content": "<p>Same here. Original process ran clean in full train series reading. But needed try/except wraps for hidden test.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Same here. Original process ran clean in full train series reading. But needed try/except wraps for hidden test.",
      "votes": 2
    },
    {
      "id": 3292067,
      "postDate": "2025-09-20T23:28:06.220Z",
      "content": "<p>Yeah, it looks like there are  quite a few bugs in the test test</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Yeah, it looks like there are  quite a few bugs in the test test"
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 3293026,
      "author_name": "Sergio Alvarez",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2025-09-22T23:19:58.203000",
      "content": "<p>Hi <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/vaillant\" target=\"_blank\">@vaillant</a>, we've successfully submitted without try-except blocks. But DICOM attributes do have default values in getattr though 🤔</p>",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 3294248,
          "author_name": "xmh",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2025-09-25T16:56:19.817000",
          "content": "<p>Hi! May I ask if you noticed which attribute may have a flaw in the hidden test set? For me I find the multiframe dcms are fishy, and 'PixelSpacing' and 'ImageOrientationPatient' could be the problem</p>",
          "votes": 1,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 3294349,
              "author_name": "Sergio Alvarez",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "2025-09-25T23:44:35.253000",
              "content": "<p>Sorry <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/wenxiaozhan\" target=\"_blank\">@wenxiaozhan</a>, I don't know what could be wrong. But I'm not accessing PixelSpacing neither ImageOrientationPatient. InstanceNumber, Modality, RescaleSlope, and RescaleIntercept were accessed with no problem.</p>",
              "votes": 2,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 3292126,
      "author_name": "Arunodhayan",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2025-09-21T05:12:15.067000",
      "content": "<p>Nope , i think there is a problem in multiframe</p>",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 3292146,
      "author_name": "Ángel Jacinto Sánchez Ruiz",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2025-09-21T06:30:02.763000",
      "content": "<p>Same here. Original process ran clean in full train series reading. But needed try/except wraps for hidden test.</p>",
      "votes": 2,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 3292067,
      "author_name": "Ravon",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2025-09-20T23:28:06.220000",
      "content": "<p>Yeah, it looks like there are  quite a few bugs in the test test</p>",
      "votes": 0,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "3292060": "Curious if anyone has been able to successfully submit a notebook that does not skip failed studies with a try-except block.\n\nMy loading function works on all the training series without issues but pretty quickly throws an exception when I submit. The notebook I am submitting just runs the loading function and submits a dummy prediction of all 0.5.",
    "3293026": "Hi @vaillant, we've successfully submitted without try-except blocks. But DICOM attributes do have default values in getattr though 🤔",
    "3292126": "Nope , i think there is a problem in multiframe\n",
    "3292146": "Same here. Original process ran clean in full train series reading. But needed try/except wraps for hidden test.",
    "3292067": "Yeah, it looks like there are  quite a few bugs in the test test"
  }
}